Is Fuzz really that different than MySpace? Both are social networking sites, both are record labels, and both have apparently signed the same talent.
I think MySpace and Fuzz signed these guys because they 'look like rock stars.' That's why they are each label's flagship talent. What's with Internet labels signing skinny white guys with belly shirts and boot cut jeans? Puh leeze bootcut jeans are totally out. Britney already mastered that - so back off Britney. The fact that the Lovemakers were signed WAY after Mickey Avalon kind of makes Scott Blonde a Payless ShoeSource of a talent, which I am sure he is not entirely.
Fuzz, seriously guys, work in partnership with other labels. Don't try to be a pop factory like American Idol or something. It's not gonna work. How are you guys really that different if you look the same?
